|
Resistance Is Futile
Almost 40 years after
its release, Jean-Pierre Melville's devastating
masterpiece about the French anti-Nazi movement
makes its U.S. debut.
AROUND 1971 JEAN-PIERRE MELVILLE SAID, “I
sometimes read (I am thinking of the reviews
after Le Samourai and Army of Shadows),
‘Melville is being Bressonian.’
I’m sorry, but it’s Bresson who
has always been Melvillian.”
Melville’s assertion—echoed by
critic Andre Bazin and allegedly by Robert
Bresson himself—may seem startling. Melville
is best known for his eight noir features,
all of them stylish and artificial in a way
that seems utterly foreign to the more physical
and neorealistic surfaces of Bresson’s
work. But these differences are ultimately
superficial. What the two filmmakers have in
common is much more important: the styles,
themes, and philosophical positions of both
can be traced directly to their experiences
during World War II.
Bresson spent nine months in a German internment
camp in 1940-’41, before the occupation
of France, and his imprisonment is alluded
to in one of his greatest films, A Man Escaped
(1956). Melville, born Jean-Pierre Grumbach,
joined the resistance in the early 40s—changing
his Jewish surname to Cartier and then Melville
in homage to Herman Melville—and three
of his 13 features, all made after the war,
deal with the German occupation. The Silence
of the Sea, from 1948, was his first feature,
and Leon Morin, Priest, from 1961, was his
biggest commercial success. But Army of
Shadows, from 1969, is his only film about
the resistance. It’s now opening in the
U.S. for the first time and playing here at
the Music Box. (This English title is vastly
superior to two earlier ones, Army in the
Shadows and The Shadow Army, because,
as critic J. Hoberman points out, the title’s
meaning is literal—all the soldiers in
this army are doomed.)
The works of Melville and Bresson both are
full of despair, but Army of Shadows
is devastating. I didn’t even want to
admit at first that it’s a great film,
but now I think it may be Melville’s
best. Part of me has always resisted the macho
stoicism of much of Melville’s work as
well as the implied hysteria. I’ve also
always preferred his black-and-white features
to his more dandyish color ones, but here his
use of color is so subdued I almost remember
the film in black and white. Its two and a
half hours chart the increasingly difficult
decisions made by a middle-aged resistance
leader named Gerbier (Lino Ventura) and his
comrades and their ultimately futile consequences.
Among other things, they have to decide whether
to assassinate a noble and courageous fellow
resistance member who’s been captured
and tortured by the gestapo—they don’t
know whether she’s been broken or not
but want to be sure she won’t be. Torture
comes up throughout the film, though Melville
refuses to show any of it; instead he focuses
on some of the results, which are grisly enough.
Army of Shadows is based on a novel
of the same title by Joseph Kessel (also the
author of the source novel for Luis Buñuel’s
very different Belle de Jour), which
Melville first read in 1943 and which is said
to be far more optimistic than the film. Like
other features of his, it suggests that the
extreme solitude of most of its characters
can be explained by secret wounds—also
a theme of one of his favorite movies, which
he reportedly saw dozens of times, The Asphalt
Jungle. It’s tempting to speculate
on the biographical basis for this focus. Unlike
Bresson, who kept much of his life concealed
from public scrutiny, Melville was something
of an exhibitionist who projected an invented
persona—another way of hiding. (A record
of this persona is the novelist Parvulesco
in Jean-Luc Godard’s Breathless,
which Melville played and acknowledged was
himself.)
Melville’s oeuvre teems with subtexts,
and the primary one in Army of Shadows
may well be the Holocaust. The deepest psychic
wound of some Jews who survived the Holocaust
is the guilt over being spared while so many
others were not, and, with the possible exception
of Shoah (1985), this film seems to
embody that metaphysical defeatism more than
any other I can think of. The director of Shoah,
Claude Lanzmann (also the editor of Les
Temps Modernes, the magazine founded in
1945 by Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir),
grew up in the shadow of existentialism—as
did Melville, who moved in some of the same
circles. (Juliette Greco, the official chanteuse
of the existentialists, was a friend of Melville’s
and starred in his third feature.) The existentialists
accepted the necessity of making difficult
choices, and that necessity is what makes this
evocation of the Holocaust vastly superior
to Schindler’s List, which comforts
rather than disturbs. That necessity also explains
why so much of the suspense in Army of Shadows,
as in the best movies of Hitchcock, is inflected
by moral conflict.
I had trouble reconciling the realism of Army
of Shadows with the mannerism of Melville’s
noirs. But then I came across a review Dave
Kehr wrote for the Reader in 1982 of The
Silence of the Sea and Bob le Flambeur
(1955), Melville’s first noir: “Much
of Melville’s work hangs on a paradox:
in silent self-containment there is certainty,
strength, and integrity, but also a kind of
death; when the silence is broken—as
it must be broken—life and emotion enter,
only to destroy completely. Melville’s
films are about the violation of closed worlds,
a violation both necessary and fatal.”
Whether or not Kehr saw Army of Shadows
before writing this, he perfectly captures
what binds Melville’s noirs to his films
about the war.
Kehr’s terms are abstract and metaphysical,
but part of what’s so devastating about
Army of Shadows is how physically we
respond to the terrible decisions faced by
the resistance fighters. In the case of one
fighter, the previously mentioned noble and
courageous one, powerfully played by Simone
Signoret, we witness one of the worst. Signoret’s
character has kept her underground activities
a secret even from her husband and her daughter,
and though Gerbier advises her to stop carrying
a photograph of her daughter, we discover that
she hasn’t when the gestapo officers
find it and threaten to force her daughter
into prostitution if she doesn’t talk.
In Kehr’s terms, the mother’s photo
becomes a necessary and fatal violation of
the closed world of the resistance.
Directed and written
by Jean-Pierre Melville | With Lino Ventura,
Paul Meurisse, Jean-Pierre Cassel, Simone Signoret,
Claude Mann, Paul Crauchet, Christian Barbier,
and Serge Reggiani
|
|